Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Woodrome v. Daniels

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 2010No. 10-243PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELANA CUNNINGHAM WILLS, Justice.

I,In this original action, petitioner, Brandon Woodrome, seeks this court’s review of the Secretary of State’s determination regarding the legal sufficiency of a statewide initiative petition. The petition, sponsored by the “Arkansas Progressive Group,”1 bears the popular |2name “A Constitutional Amendment to Repeal All State Taxes and Establish A Flat Rate Sales Tax.” On December 21, 2009, the Arkansas Progressive Group submitted its proposed popular name and ballot title to the Attorney General for review and certification pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roberts v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  2. Ozark Gas Pipeline Corp. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Barclay v. First Paris Holding Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  4. Bank of Eureka Springs v. EvansSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Ward v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roeder v. United StatesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. City of Benton v. Alcoa Road Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  3. City of Benton v. Alcoa Road Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  4. City of Fort Smith, Arkansas v. Gary Osborne and Donna OsborneCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
  5. Mendoza v. WIS International, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API