Legal Opinion

Stumpp v. Bank of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 1, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dowling, J.:

This is an action by the appellants as depositors to recover a sum of money claimed to have been paid from their account by the respondent bank on forged checks. The bank pleaded as a defense to the first two checks that notice of the forgery was not given within a year, as provided in section 326 of the Negotiable Instruments Law. The appellants concede this defense to be valid. As a defense to the remaining forged checks the bank pleaded that the depositor was guilty of negligence in examining the statements of account rendered by the bank, which negligence contributed to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Weisser v. . DenisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Stumpp v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wussow v. Badger State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Huber Glass Co. v. First National Bank of KenoshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Screenland Magazine, Inc. v. National City BankNew York Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Clarke v. Camden Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
  5. John G. Paton Co. v. Guaranty Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API