Legal Opinion

Huber Glass Co. v. First National Bank of Kenosha

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1965PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The law concerning the duty of a bank towards its depositor was summarized in Wussow v. Badger State Bank. 2 Since their relationship is grounded in contract, a bank can only make payments from a depositor’s account in accordance with proper authorization and is bound to restore any amount paid out on forged checks. A bank can only avoid this strict liability where the “depositor is in equity estopped to assert that the bank is absolutely liable.” 3 To do this successfully, the bank must show (1) that it was without fault in failing to detect the forgeries, and (2) that the depositor was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. United States Mortgage & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Wussow v. Badger State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Hope Acres, Inc. v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Town of Mt. Pleasant v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Philipp Lithographing Co. v. BabichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Transamerica Insurance v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Pine Bluff National Bank v. KestersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Schaller v. Marine National Bank of NeenahCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
  4. Clark Oil & Refining Corp. v. City of TomahWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. K & K Manufacturing, Inc. v. Union BankCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API