Legal Opinion

Wayne Mfg. Co. v. Coffield Motor Washer Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 4, 1913No. 3,939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Suit in equity by the Cóffield Motor Washer Company against the Wayne Manufacturing Company and the American Washer Company. From an order granting a preliminary injunction, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

AMIDON, District Judge.

[1] This is an appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction to restrain defendants, appellants here, from infringing plaintiff’s patent, No. 12,719, for a water motor. The patent has been sustained, after protracted litigation, in the Fourth circuit. P. T. Coffield & Son v. Spears & Riddle et al. (C. C.) 169 Fed. 641; Coffield Motor Washer Co. v. A. D. Howe Co. (C. C.) 172 Fed. 668; A. D. Howe Mach. Co. v. Coffield Motor Washer Co., 197 Fed. 541, 117 C. C. A. 37. The drawings and specifications are there set out in full, and need not be repeated here. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Grain Separator Co. v. Twin City Separator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  2. A. D. Howe Mach. Co. v. Coffield Motor Washer Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1912
  3. Peter T. Coffield & Son v. Spears & RiddleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia · 1909
  4. Fireball Gas Tank & Illuminating Co. v. Commercial Acetylene Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  5. Coffield Motor Washer Co. v. A. D. Howe Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Minneapolis Electric Lamp Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1924
  2. Kansas City v. Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API