Legal Opinion

Coffield Motor Washer Co. v. A. D. Howe Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia

Decided September 8, 1909PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction and motion to strike out cross-bill. The complainant has filed its bill in this cause, alleging the issuance to Peter T. Coffield on December 12, 1905, of letters patent No. 800,779 for water motors, the assignment thereof on March 20, 1900, by Coffield to the firm of P. T. Cof-field & Son, the surrender by this firm of this original and the issue to it on November 12, 1907, of reissue letters patent No. 12,719 for the same…

Read the full summary

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction and motion to strike out cross-bill. The complainant has filed its bill in this cause, alleging the issuance to Peter T. Coffield on December 12, 1905, of letters patent No. 800,779 for water motors, the assignment thereof on March 20, 1900, by Coffield to the firm of P. T. Cof-field & Son, the surrender by this firm of this original and the issue to it on November 12, 1907, of reissue letters patent No. 12,719 for the same invention, the assignment on May 28, 1909, of said reissue patent by said firm of P. T. Coffield & Son to complainant, a…

1Opinion of the Court

DAYTON", District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). In the case of Peter T. Coffield & Sou v. Spears & Riddle et al. (C. C.) 169 Fed. 641, I fully considered the validity of complainant’s reissue patent No. 12,719 in view of the prior art, and therein stated that I had no trouble “in reaching the same conclusion arrived at by the Board of Appeals in the Patent Office, that Coffield, the patentee, was the first fo use in connection with the elements of the mechanism springs which complete the stroke of the valve, and that, taken as a whole, the device is new, useful, and patentable.” I…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  4. Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
  5. Grant v. RaymondSupreme Court of the United States · 1832

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wayne Mfg. Co. v. Coffield Motor Washer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Neff v. Coffield Motor Washer Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1913
  3. Wayne Mfg. Co. v. Coffield Motor Washer Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  4. Coffield Motor Washer Co. v. A. D. Howe Mach. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern West Virginia · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API