Legal Opinion

Wiley v. Martin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 21, 1926No. 5341PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

1. The acts of J. W. Wiley in purchasing the land and accepting the deed from the plaintiff were admissions of title in plaintiff. So also was the act of J. W. Wiley in executing the security deed to the plaintiff. While the debt was unpaid Wiley was estopped to deny the plaintiff’s title as security; and the debt being overdue, the security deed alone would be sufficient to support the plaintiff’s action of ejectment. The above is application of well-recognized principles of law that have been many times applied in this court. So the judge did not err in directing the verdict against J. W.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. TateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Churchill v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Clark v. Empire Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  5. Ivey v. ColquittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clarence L. Martin, P.C. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Nelson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Haden v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  4. Plunkett's School for Boys v. City of ThomasvilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  5. Atlanta Title & Trust Co. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API