(PC) Pangborn v. CDCR
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAVID JAMES PANGBORN, No. 2:22-cv-1998 DAD KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CDCR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Defendants California Department of 18 Corrections (“CDCR”), J. Lynch, P. Hess, L. Hightower, J. Orellana, and C. Bechtold removed 19 this action from the Sacramento County Superior Court and paid this court’s filing fee. This 20 proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 21 Because plaintiff…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.