Legal Opinion

Gold Ridge Partners v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2012No. 57084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*498OPINION

By the Court,

Parraguirre, J.:

In this opinion, we address a motion to remand in an eminent domain action. Under Nevada law, a public agency may take private property for a public use by instituting an eminent domain action and paying just compensation to the property’s owner. If, at any time during the pendency of the eminent domain proceeding, the public agency determines that it no longer needs the property, the eminent domain statutes provide that the agency may abandon the action and move for dismissal of the case. In this proceeding, we consider whether a public agency may abandon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leven v. FreyNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Foster v. DingwallNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Savage v. Third Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Carl Roessler, Inc. v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Redl v. Secretary of StateNevada Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bielar v. Washoe Health Systems, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API