Legal Opinion

Kay Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 10, 1982No. 478-73PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKunzig, Judge

This renegotiation case comes before the court on plaintiffs exceptions to the findings of fact, conclusions of law, *84and recommended opinion issued by Trial Judge Yannello on September 29, 1980, in accordance with Rule 134(h).1 The Trial Judge held that Kay Manufacturing Company (Kay or plaintiff) had realized excessive profits of $111,332 during fiscal year 1969, the review year in issue, from renegotiable subcontracts for the machining of 105-mm. cartridge case bases. Profits earned under these subcontracts were subject to the provisions of the Renegotiation Act of 1951 (the Act), 50 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Major Coat Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  3. Aero Spacelines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. Butkin Precision Manufacturing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  5. Camel Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kay Manufacturing Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Bailey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. Equipment, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Wells Marine, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  5. August Gava, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API