Legal Opinion
Bailey v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 13, 1983No. 230-80CPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge:
This matter is now before the court on plaintiff’s application, pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, Pub.L. 96-481, 94 Stat. 2325, 2327-28, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (1980 Supp. IV) for attorney fees and expenses, and defendant’s opposition thereto. This is one of some 34 such applications, arising on essentially identical facts and raising essentially identical legal issues, now pending before the author judge.1 The matter has been fully briefed, and oral argument has been held.
The attorney fees2 and expenses3 sought in the pending application were incurred in the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- BROAD AVENUE LAUNDRY AND TAILORING, Petitioner, v. the UNITED STATES, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Photo Data, Inc. v. SawyerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1982
- Waterman Steamship Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Alspach v. District Director of Internal RevenueDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Leroy H. Ellis v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- James A. Bailey v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Greenberg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Kanehl v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.