Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Ohio Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. Conrad
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 2002No. 2001-0315PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Appellant, Ohio Aluminum Industries, Inc. (“OA”), makes high-precision products for the military, automotive, and aerospace industries. After the pieces are cast, they undergo rigorous testing and inspection. Machining and milling are sometimes required.
{¶ 2} In 1982, appellee, Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation, inspected OA’s plant to determine the appropriate manual classifications for OA’s risk for purposes of fixing OA’s premium rate. The report discussed various foundry activities and noted that the plant had a machine shop that was physically separated from the castings…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Progressive Sweeping Contractors, Inc. v. Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State, Ex Rel. v. Ind. Com.Ohio Supreme Court · 1942
- State ex rel. Roberds, Inc. v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Ohio Aluminum Industries, Inc. v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. NHVS Internatl., Inc. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Rms of Ohio v. Bureau of Workers' Comp., Unpublished Decision (3-31-2006)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Craftsman Basement Fini. Sys. v. Mabe, 06ap-1201 (11-6-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007