Legal Opinion

Crouchley v. Pambianchi

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 2, 1964PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

We discuss a single aspect of this case which is conclusive of the appeal. The decision in Crouchley v. Pambianchi, 149 Conn. 512, 182 A.2d 11, was rendered on May 18, 1962. By a substituted complaint dated October 4, 1962, the present action was commenced seeking to enjoin the named defendant, her husband, the Shell Oil Company, the commissioner of motor vehicles, the zoning board of appeals of Ridgefield and the Ridgefield building inspector from permitting or proceeding with the establishment of a gasoline filling station under the authority of the procedures which were in issue in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. Hartford Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  2. Smith v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Holt v. WissingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  4. Ginsberg v. MasciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
  5. Goodwin v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cahill v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. City of Hartford v. American Arbitration Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Karls v. Alexandra Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Scoville v. RonalterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Hartford Electric Light Co. v. LevitzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API