Legal Opinion

Fred and Bonnie Besaw v. General Finance Corporation of Georgia

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 13, 1982No. 82-8321PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

In this Truth in Lending Act case, we must determine whether General Finance Corporation of Georgia (GFC) disclosed the components of a finance charge in a meaningful sequence on its loan agreement, as required by Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.-6(a). Agreeing with the trial court that the sequence is not meaningful, we affirm.

FACTS

On June 19,1980, the appellees, Fred and Bonnie Besaw, entered into a consumer credit transaction with GFC. Their argument, successful in the district court, asserts that GFC’s loan agreement failed to disclose the components of the finance charge in a meaningful…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Basham v. Finance America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
  3. Dorothy Allen v. Beneficial Finance Company of Gary, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. Ivory Dorsey v. Citizens & Southern Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Riveria v. MAB Collections, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1988
  2. Diaz v. Virginia Housing Development AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
  3. Misher v. Household Finance Consumer Discount Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API