Legal Opinion

O'Neal v. Kellett

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1981No. 8127SC311PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

On a motion for summary judgment under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56, the burden is on the movant to show to the court that there are no genuine issues of material fact to be tried in the case and that the movant is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Vassey v. Burch, 301 N.C. 68, 269 S.E. 2d 137 (1980). The rule does not allow the court to decide an issue of fact. Vassey, supra. As a general rule, issues of negligence are not ordinarily susceptible to summary disposition. It is only in the exceptional negligence case that summary judgment is appropriate, because the rule of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Fiber Controls Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Vassey v. BurchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Lenz v. Ridgewood AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Wallsee v. CAROLINA WATER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. C. W. Myers Trading Post, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Brooks v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Hockaday v. MorseCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Draughon v. Evening Star Holiness Church of DunnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. Martin v. Kilauea Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API