Legal Opinion

Inner Harbor Warehouse and Distribution, Inc. v. Myers

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 13, 1989No. 1167, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRITY, Judge.

In this appeal, a principal contractor contends that the lower court erred in holding it responsible under Section 62 of Art. 101 of the Code for obtaining workers’ compensation coverage for the owner of an uninsured subcontracting company. The owner was injured while transporting goods . on behalf of the principal contractor.

In resolving the issue of coverage we shall determine the following: whether the failure of a controlling shareholder and officer of a subcontracting close corporation to purchase workers’ compensation insurance for the corporation’s employees acts as an…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hornbeck v. Somerset County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  2. Victory Sparkler & Specialty Co. v. FrancksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
  3. Liscombe v. Potomac Edison Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Coffey v. Derby Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Inner Harbor Warehouse, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. Gray & Son, Inc. v. Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  3. Imbraguglio v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API