Legal Opinion

White v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 1917PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error : Court of Appeals for Mahoning county.

1Opinion of the CourtFarr, J.

This is a proceeding in error prosecuted in this court from the judgment of the court *369of common pleas of Mahoning county. The parties sustain the same relation here as in the court below.

On the 28th day of January, 1916, plaintiff in error, Kate E. White, began an action in the municipal court of the city of Youngstown against defendant in error, George M. Smith, to recover the sum of $168 and costs; the principal part of said sum for which recovery was sought was for installments of rentals falling due by the terms of a certain agreement in writing made and entered into between said parties…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Becar v. . FluesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Underhill v. . CollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Higgins v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Goldman v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Gray v. Kaufman Dairy & Ice Cream Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gruman v. Investors Diversified Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Shaker Building Co. v. Federal Lime & Stone Co.Shaker Heights Municipal Court · 1971
  3. B & G Properties Ltd. Partnership v. Office Max, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. New Towne Ltd. Partnership v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Rosenberger v. HearsnipOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API