Legal Opinion

Rosenberger v. Hearsnip

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Plaintiff in error maintains that the court below should have directed a verdict for the plaintiff and that final judgment should be entered in this court in favor of the paintiff in error for the amount of the rental, but does not urge the matter of damages pleaded in the plaintiff’s petition.

It is well settled that a lessee is not relieved from his obligation to -pay the stipulated rental by the mere assignment of the lease to a third party, even though the lessor assents thereto.

16 R. C. L., 843, Sec. 343;

36 C. J„ 371, Sec. 1227;

Taylor vs. DeBus, et al., 31 Ohio St., 468;

Harmony Lodge vs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blosser v. EnderlinOhio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. White v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Axel Schulz v. United States Boxing AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. New Towne Ltd. Partnership v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Sandusky Mall Co. v. Pet Corner, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Cones v. LindenbergOhio Court of Appeals · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API