Legal Opinion
United Surety & Indemnity Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 16, 2009No. 08-791CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION
SUSAN G. BRADEN, Judge.
On July 13, 2009, Plaintiff filed a Motion For Reconsideration (“Pl.Mot.”) of the June 30, 2009 Memorandum Opinion and Final Order in United Surety and Indemnity Co. v. United States, 87 Fed.Cl. 580 (2009). For the reasons discussed herein, Plaintiffs Motion For Reconsideration is denied.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, PURSUANT TO RCFC 59.
A motion for reconsideration must be supported “by a showing of extraordinary *205circumstances which justify relief.” Caldwell v. United States, 391 F.3d 1226, 1235…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE WEST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Balboa Insurance Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Magnum Opus Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010