Legal Opinion

In re Appeal From the Settlement & Audit of the Auditors of Buckingham Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1204 C.D. 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

The Buckingham Township Supervisors (supervisors) appeal here an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County which subjected them to a surcharge in the amount of $35,743.231 for monies unlawfully paid from Township funds. Section 545 of the Second Class Township Code (Township Code), Act of May 1, 1933, P.L. 103, as amended, 53 P.S. §65545.

It was stipulated that the supervisors, in their official capacities, approved2 the expenditures here in question and that these expenditures were made in a *616successful effort to lobby before the state legislature for the passage…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kline v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  2. Borough of Scottdale v. National Cable Television Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Mayo's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Brose v. Easton Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Monroe County Auditors' ReportSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warner Cable Communications Inc. v. Borough of Schuylkill HavenDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. In re 1980 Auditors' ReportCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Watts Twp. Board of Auditors v. P. Gutheil, Watts Twp SupervisorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Watts Twp Board of Auditors v. K. Raudensky, Watts Twp SupervisorCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API