Legal Opinion

Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v. Industrial Tape Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 6, 1948No. 9467PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJOR, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint in a suit for patent infringement. The order of dismissal followed the court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, in which it was found that the claims in suit were invalid because anticipated by certain prior art patents and publications, and that no patentable invention was shown in view of the prior art.

The patent in suit No. 2,221,213, entitled “Tape Dispenser,” issued November 12, 1940, to John A. Borden (referred to as the Borden device) and later assigned to plaintiff, relates to a device used…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hendy v. Golden State & Miners' Iron WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Bank v. Rauland Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
  3. Oswell v. BloomfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  4. International Steel Wool Corp. v. Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1943

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anton Lorenz v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. National Transformer Corp. v. France Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954
  3. Vischer Products Co. v. National Pressure Cooker Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  4. Borkland v. PedersenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1956
  5. Anton Lorenz v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API