Legal Opinion
State v. Noteboom
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 2008No. 24665PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Aaron Noteboom appeals his conviction for Driving under the Influence of Alcohol. Noteboom claims that the stop of his vehicle violated his right against unreasonable search and seizure. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On September 24, 2006, at approximately 2:00 a.m., Deputy Sheriff Troy Strid and Corsica Chief of Police Marty Banghart were both patrolling at separate locations on Highway 281 in Corsica, South Dakota. Both police officers saw automobile headlights appear and then disappear in the distance near 274th Street on the edge of Corsica. The headlights seemed to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- In re H.L.S.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. IversenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. StarkeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- In Re HLSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009