Legal Opinion

State v. Iversen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2009No. 24960PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] James Iversen appeals his conviction for driving or control of a vehicle with a prohibited blood alcohol level. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] At approximately 1:30 on the morning of January 5, 2008, a police officer patrolling in the City of Madison passed by the parking lot of an agricultural supply store. Behind an old gas station in the parking lot, the officer observed a Ford pickup parked beside a semi trailer. The lights of the pickup were off and the engine was running. Because of the early-morning hour and a history of battery thefts in the area, the officer became concerned and pulled…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HaarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. RademakerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. RolfeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Barton v. BartonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. SharpfishSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API