Legal Opinion

National Abortion Federation v. Center for Medical Progress

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2019No. 17-16622PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, No. 17-16622 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-03522- WHO CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS; BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES, LLC; DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis; TROY NEWMAN, Defendants, and STEVE COOLEY; BRENTFORD J. FERREIRA, Respondents-Appellants. 2 NAF V. CMP NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION, No. 17-16862 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 3:15-cv-03522- WHO CENTER FOR MEDICAL PROGRESS; DAVID DALEIDEN, AKA Robert Daoud Sarkis, OPINION Defendants-Appellants, and BIOMAX PROCUREMENT SERVICES,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Cunningham v. Hamilton CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Fox v. Capital Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Steven Mark Lasar v. Ford Motor Company, and Lawrence SutterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Portland Feminist Women's Health Center Leila Whittemore Geri Craig Amy Aycrigg v. Advocates for Life, Inc., and Ivars Bitans Roger FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re: Hillary Clinton (REVISED)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
  2. Victor Parsons v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. In re: Hillary ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API