Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Roseman
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 21, 1995No. Civ. N-94-3184PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
NORTHROP, Senior District Judge.
The instant action brings for resolution before this Court a petition for removal by Defendants MD-Individual Practice Associates, Inc., t/a MD-IPA and Mid Atlantic Services, Inc. (collectively “MD-IPA”), a motion to remand by Defendant Dr. Barry Roseman (“Dr. Roseman”), and a motion to remand by Plaintiff Merle Jackson (“Jackson”). MD-IPA has filed an opposition to Jackson’s motion to remand. No hearing is necessary. Local'Rule 105.6 (D.Md.1992, as amended 1994). For the following reasons, MD-IPA’s petition for removal shall be dismissed, and Dr.…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- Lancaster Ex Rel. Lancaster v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- Hinterlong v. BaldwinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Pacificare of Oklahoma, Inc. v. BurrageCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Chaghervand v. CarefirstDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.