Harrow v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, refusing anew trial after a trial before Stearns, J., and verdict of $ 19 5'. 5 8 for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
1. There is sufficient evidence that the hors.e for the value of which this action is brought, was killed on the line of defendant’s road by one of its trains, and beyond the limits of the depot-grounds. There is also evidence tending to show that the cattle-guard above or beyond which the horse was found after he was killed was insufficient to prevent him from passing over to the place where the injury probably occurred, and that the defect was one of *72construction. So that, for the purposes of this appeal, there is evidence sufficient to show that the injury complained of resulted from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stevens v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Anthony v. StinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1867
- Johnson v. HillstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- Busch v. Busch Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Sawh v. City of Lino LakesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Uhlman v. Farm, Stock & Home Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Humphreys v. Minnesota Clay Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Farmers' & Merchants' Bank of Vandalia v. MainesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.