Legal Opinion

Christie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 1989No. 88-1412PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIGGINTON, Judge.

This appeal was brought pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). The judgment and sentence are affirmed, but we agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs under sections 960.20 and 943.25(4), Florida Statutes, without notice or the opportunity to object. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provisions without *545prejudice to the State to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. Fanning v. State, 537 So.2d 197 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  3. Fanning v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coupe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Hart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API