Legal Opinion
Fanning v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 20, 1989No. 87-1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in imposing court costs and attorney fees without notice or the opportunity to be heard. Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). Accordingly, we strike the cost provision without prejudice to the state to seek reassessment after proper notice to appellant. The judgments *198and sentences are affirmed in all other respects.
RYDER, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ayers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Christie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989