Legal Opinion

Gorman v. Hunt

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2000No. 1998-SC-0159-DGPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLER, Justice.

I. ISSUE

This pedestrian-motor vehicle accident case presents one primary issue. During his testimony, Dr. Smock, an expert witness for the driver Hunt, was allowed by the trial court, over the pedestrian Gor-man’s objection, to use posed photographs showing Gorman’s position relative to Hunt’s vehicle immediately prior to and at the time of the accident. The photographs illustrated Dr. Smock’s opinion of how the accident occurred but were inconsistent with Gorman’s version. Was it error for the trial court to allow the posed photographs to be used by Dr. Smock? Because we find…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Bledsoe Surface Mining Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. RoseKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Buckler v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ford v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bowling Green Gas Light Co. v. Dean's Extx.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Martindale v. RippWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Osborne v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Martin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Simmonds v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010
  5. Balderas v. StarksCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API