Legal Opinion

Akers v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 30, 1924No. 13234PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DICKSON, C.

On the 5th day of January, 1920, the defendant in error, Crayton S. Brooks, commenced an action in the district court of Carter county, Okla., against the plaintiff in error, J. H. Akers and Mrs. J. H. Akers, his wife, under the provision of section 466, Comp. Stat. 1921, for the purpose of determining the adverse claim or interest of said Akers and wife in and to certain real estate in Carter county, and for possession of said real estate, and for damages for the wrongful detention thereof.

The parties will be referred to hereafter as plaintiff and defendants as they were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ullsperger v. MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Cannon v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Dunn v. YakishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  4. Jones v. Moncrief-Cook Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Holland v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gall v. BrashierCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
  2. Quincy Showcase Works v. BriscoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. Schuerer v. CrockettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Creeden v. NorthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Cox v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API