State v. Hagen

OPINION

WREN, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of illegally using a telephone in violation of A.R.S. § 13-895A, and placed on probation for one year. He contends on appeal that:

1. A.R.S. § 13-895A is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad;

2. The court erred in denying his motion for a Bill of Particulars;

3. The court erred in denying his motion in limine;

4. The motion for mistrial should have been granted because of (a) evidence of prior bad acts, and (b) misconduct by the prosecutor in his closing argument;

5. There was a denial of his constitutional right to self-representation and to…