In the Matter of Rodella
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
{1} This case came before us on a petition for the permanent removal of Magistrate Judge Thomas R. Rodella. While this Court does not agree with all the findings and conclusions of the Judicial Standards Commission (the Commission), after our own review of the record, we hold that sufficient clear and convincing evidence was introduced to conclude that Judge Rodella committed willful misconduct. Moreover, we agree with the Commission that the evidence demonstrates that Judge Rodella’s testimony lacked credibility. This lack of credibility and an apparent unwillingness to admit…
3Cases cited13 opinions
- Republican Party of Minnesota v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- New Mexico Board of Veterinary Medicine v. RieggerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. HoeffelNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
- STATE JUDICIAL STANDARDS COM'N v. EspinosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State ex rel. New Mexico Judicial Standards Commission v. EspinosaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by4 opinions
- Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 2009-081New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Brandon K. Kuykendall v. New Mexico Judicial Standards CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026
- In Re DetsoiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2026
- In Re SchwartzNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011