Legal Opinion

Angle v. Bd. of Dentistry

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 17, 2018No. A162472PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAoyagi, J.

*471The Board of Dentistry suspended petitioner's license to practice dentistry after concluding that he violated ORS 679.170(6) by failing to respond to two information requests from the board. Petitioner seeks judicial review of the board's order. In his first assignment of error, petitioner argues that he did not "fail to respond" within the meaning of ORS 679.170(6). In his second assignment of error, he asserts that, if the order stands as to the violations, then the board abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sanction. For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the board erred…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Wolff v. Board of Psychologist ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SteedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  2. State v. SteedCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API