Legal Opinion
Daney v. United States
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 12, 1965No. Civ. A. W-3046PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY E. BROWN, District Judge.
This is a civil suit brought to recover a sum certain, plus interest, alleged to have been wrongly taxed and collected by defendant on income received in 1958 by plaintiff Joseph Daney in the form of a cash bonus paid for the execution of an oil and gas lease. Plaintiff Bertha Daney is a party to this suit only because the Daneys filed a joint return for the calendar year 1958. The transaction involved occurred in 1958; at that time and at. all pertinent times, plaintiff Joseph Daney was a noncompetent, restricted, full-blooded Choctaw Indian No. 6206. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Burnet v. HarmelSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Choate v. TrappSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Squire v. CapoemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Elk v. WilkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Choteau v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- Charles J. Oropallo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Horton Capoeman v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- Joseph I. Swietlik, Personal Representative of the Estate of Helen v. Safran, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Lena Harkins and Adam Harkins, for Themselves and for All Those Members of the Five Civilized Tribes Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.