Legal Opinion
Crum v. Rea
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 1896No. 1,795PublishedCited by 5 opinions
From the Henry Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The first specification of error assigned in this court questions the sufficiency of the first paragraph of the answer, which, omitting the caption, reads as follows :
“.The defendant for answer to. complaint says: Par. 1. That on the 26th day of January, 1894, in an action then pending in the Henry Circuit Court of the State of Indiana by the plaintiff against the defendant, in which plaintiff alleged the same facts as are stated in the complaint in this action and that final judgment was rendered in said cause on the day above mentioned. ”
It is insisted by counsel for appellant that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McFadden v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Jones v. VertIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Parker v. ObenchainIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Kitts v. WillsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- Kramer v. MatthewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Smith v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- Elkhart Paper Co. v. FulkersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
- State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Trook v. CrouchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Gardner v. Springfield Gas & Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1911