Legal Opinion

State v. Janvrin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 7, 1981No. 80-371PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue in this conspiracy to commit arson case is whether the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy bars the retrial of the defendant on the present indictment when a previous defective indictment alleging the same offense was dismissed on the defendant’s motion after the jury was empaneled and sworn. We hold that it does not.

The defendant was indicted in June 1979 for conspiring with Frank Janvrin to commit arson by burning the defendant’s house. A jury was empaneled and sworn, but prior to the State’s opening statement the defendant moved to dismiss the indictment because it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. PuglieseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BarancoHawaii Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. SielSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  3. Huff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  4. State v. KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  5. State v. PondSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API