Legal Opinion

State v. Pond

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 28, 1990No. 89-473PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.

The defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2, XI, after a jury trial in Superior Court (Groff, J.). He raises two issues for our review: (1) whether, after the impaneling of the jury at a previous trial, the State may nol pros its case in order to correct a defective indictment and then later retry the defendant on the same charge without violating the prohibition against double jeopardy; and (2) whether the defendant’s right to a speedy trial was violated. Because we hold that double jeopardy bars retrial of the defendant, we reverse.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  3. State v. JanvrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  4. State v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. State v. CourtemarcheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. State v. DiazSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API