State v. Pond
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The defendant appeals his conviction for aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2, XI, after a jury trial in Superior Court (Groff, J.). He raises two issues for our review: (1) whether, after the impaneling of the jury at a previous trial, the State may nol pros its case in order to correct a defective indictment and then later retry the defendant on the same charge without violating the prohibition against double jeopardy; and (2) whether the defendant’s right to a speedy trial was violated. Because we hold that double jeopardy bars retrial of the defendant, we reverse.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- State v. JanvrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- State v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1969
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1870
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AyerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- State v. CourtemarcheSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- State v. DiazSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.