Legal Opinion

In re Miller Osborne Perry Trust

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 19, 2013No. Docket No. 309725PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Susan Perry, acting as the trustee for the Miller Osborne Perry Trust (the “Trust”), appeals as of right the probate court’s finding that Mark D. Perry’s suit for declaratory relief did not constitute a challenge to the Trust within the meaning of the Trust’s forfeiture clause — otherwise known as a no-contest clause. On appeal, Susan Perry argues that the probate court clearly erred because, after it found that Mark Perry would not have had probable cause to challenge the Trust within the meaning of MCL 700.7113, it had to find that his suit triggered the no-contest clause. As such, she…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Federated Insurance v. Oakland County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  3. In Re Kostin EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. In Re REISMAN ESTATEMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Saier v. SaierMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bill & Dena Brown Trust v. GarciaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. In re Estate of StanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Linda Dice v. Esther G Bennett Revocable TrustMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. in Re Brown EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. in Re Estate and Trust of Robert E WhittonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API