State v. Hochstein
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERTRAND PORITSKY, Judge *
Appellant, convicted of drug-related offenses and the offense of being a felon in possession of a firearm, raises several issues on appeal. Appellant contends that (1) the state’s failure to follow proper discovery rules prejudiced his defense; (2) the search warrant was not supported by probable cause; (3) the trial court erred in determining he could be impeached with a prior conviction if he chose to testify; (4) the trial court erred in adjudicating him guilty of a lesser-included offense; and (5) the trial court erred in sentencing him for two crimes that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. ZanterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. AkersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State of Minnesota v. John Kevin MelinaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024