Legal Opinion

State v. York Utilities Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 7, 1946PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

There are two separate actions involved here brought against the defendant, a street railroad, to recover excise taxes assessed for the years 1943 and 1944. The issue involved in each case is exactly the same. Both cases were defaulted under an agreement that they should be heard by the court in damages with right of exceptions reserved. The only question is what is the proper method for ascertaining the rate for determining the tax and the amount thereof. The decision of this question involves an interpretation of R. S. 1930, Chap. 12, Sec. 35 as amended by P. L. 1941, Chap. 99, now…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woodward v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Maine v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1923
  3. O'Malley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mottram v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  2. Guilford Transportation Industries v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  3. Kelley v. HalperinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. A. H. Benoit & Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
  5. Soucy v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF STATE RET. SYSTEMSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API