Legal Opinion

McVaigh v. Sandberg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff brought an action for personal injuries resulting from a fall in defendants’ pharmacy. Pursuant to a jury trial, a verdict was entered for plaintiff, but the trial judge set it aside and entered a judgment n.o.v. for defendants on the ground there was no evidence of defendants’ negligence. Plaintiff appeals. The principal issue is whether there was evidence sufficient to submit to the jury of any condition of the premises which created an unreasonable risk of harm to plaintiff.

Plaintiff was a woman 65 years of age. She entered defendants’ pharmacy on a rainy Tuesday morning and,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hryciuk v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Conachan v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Utley v. City of IndependenceOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Anderson v. Oregon City Hospital Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Fulton v. BF Goodrich CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Tijerina v. Cornelius Christian ChurchOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Diller v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Katter v. Jack's Datsun Sales, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Lea v. Gino's Pizza Inn, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API