Legal Opinion

Dreiblatt v. Taylor

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 9, 1947PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Memorandum Under the circumstances disclosed by the record here, the evidence that plaintiffs’ automobile was watched from the front window of an apartment on the first floor of an apartment house before which it was parked, does not show attendance of the vehicle within the intent of the policy excluding “ loss of the property insured herein from road vehicles of every description when such vehicles are left unattended.” The attendant, assuming the watcher to be such, was not shown to be actually within or upon the automobile, or so near thereto as to be able to observe a theft of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. William Kinscherf Co. v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Phil G. Ruvelson, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Royce Furs, Inc. v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  3. JMP Associates, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. Jerome I. Silverman, Inc. v. Lloyd's UnderwritersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  5. Stephens v. Katz Parking System, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API