JMP Associates, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MARVIN H. SMITH, Judge, Specially Assigned.
We shall here hold that under the facts in this case the “on” requirement in a jeweler’s block policy that an “employee or sales personnel [be] in or on the vehicle at the time of the loss” is ambiguous. 1 (Emphasis added.)
Petitioner JMP Associates, Inc. (JMP) sued respondent The St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (StPaul) in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County for breach of contract under a jeweler’s block policy. We conclude that the trial judge erred in holding the term “in or on” unambiguous and in granting summary judgment in favor of…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Heat & Power Corp. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- King v. BankerdCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Salisbury Beauty Schools v. State Board of CosmetologistsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Mesmer v. Maryland Automobile Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance v. Maryland Yacht Club, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- White Pine Insurance Co. v. TaylorCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Harleysville Preferred Ins. Co. v. Rams Head Savage Mill, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Adventist Healthcare v. BehramCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.