Legal Opinion

Sind v. Pollin

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1976No. 10065PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERN, Associate Judge:

On September 10, 1965, appellant Sind and another individual 1 [the Sind group] entered into a joint venture agreement with appellees Pollin, Gandel, Kobrin, and Ades 2 [the Pollin group], for the purpose of developing a 139.7 acre tract of land in Maryland. The Sind group owned a contract to acquire the land, which they contributed to the venture, and the Pollin group agreed to invest all cash necessary to complete the purposes of the venture, including signing notes for the purchase price of the land. 3 Each group owned a one-half interest in the venture, and after…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. Hartsville Oil Mill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Spilker v. HankinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  4. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
  5. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Norman M. LittellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. EastBanc, Inc. v. Georgetown Park Associates II, L.P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. 2215 Fifth Street Associates, LP v. U-Haul International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  4. O & B, Inc. v. Md.-Nat'l Cap. P. & P. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. Overseas Partners, Inc. v. Progen Musavirlik Ve Yonetim Hizmetleri, Ltd. SikertiDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API