Legal Opinion
Overseas Partners, Inc. v. Progen Musavirlik Ve Yonetim Hizmetleri, Ltd. Sikerti
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 28, 1998No. Civil Action 96-2219 SSHPublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ amended renewed motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, insufficient service of process, and forum non conveniens, and related pleadings. 1 After careful 'consideration of the entire record, the Court finds that it has jurisdiction over defendants PROGEN Musa-virlik ve Yonetim Hizmetleri, Ltd. Sikerti and Neemettin Oztemir, but concludes that the instant action should be dismissed on forum non conveniens grounds as to those defendants. 2 As to the other defendants, the case is dismissed for lack of personal…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Exponential Biotherapies, Inc. v. Houthoff Buruma N.V.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- 2215 Fifth Street Associates, LP v. U-Haul International, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Brunson v. Kalil & Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Gipson v. Wells Fargo & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Ashraf-Hassan v. Embassy of France in the United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.