Legal Opinion

United States v. Hunt

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 8, 2000No. 99-1120PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.

A grand jury indicted Defendants-Ap-pellees Allen Hunt and Michelle Jones (Defendants) on 16 counts of theft from the mail in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708. During a bench trial, the district judge entered a judgment stating: “I find and conclude that the defendants are not guilty under the indictment as charged.” As part of the judgment the district judge concluded that (1) the indictment alleged a theft "from CTC Distributor’s (CTC); (2) CTC was not part of the “mail” as required for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1708; and (3) the indictment failed to allege any other…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. SalgadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. United States v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. MilesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. FarrCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  5. Commonwealth v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API