Legal Opinion

Stockdale, Inc. v. Baker

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 20, 1985No. 84-707PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

The plaintiff Stockdale, Inc. appeals from a summary judgment entered for defendant Richard J. Berns, who had cosigned a note with defendants Baker. Stockdale complains that the district court erred in ruling that, because Stockdale had failed to serve Berns a notice of proposed sale of collateral, Iowa Code section 554.9504(3) (1983), it was precluded from obtaining a deficiency judgment from him. We affirm.

The facts are largely undisputed. The defendants Robert G. Baker and Barbara M. Baker borrowed money from Stockdale to purchase body shop equipment, and the note given was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commercial Discount Corp. v. BayerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  3. Nelson v. Monarch Investment Plan of Henderson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
  4. Barnett v. BARNETT BK. OF JACKSONVILLEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
  5. Beneficial Finance Co. of Black Hawk County v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hunter v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
  2. Shawmut Worcester County Bank, N.A. v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Tenney v. Atlantic AssociatesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  4. Barnhouse v. Hawkeye State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  5. Hartford-Carlisle Savings Bank v. ShiversSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API