Hartford-Carlisle Savings Bank v. Shivers
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
The case comes to us on six certified questions from the federal district court. The questions concern the viability of the absolute bar rule in Iowa. The rule bars a secured creditor from obtaining a deficiency judgment when the creditor fails to give the debtor notice of the sale of collateral required by Iowa Code section 554.9504(3) (1993). We had strictly applied the rule until Barnhouse v. Hawkeye State Bank, 406 N.W.2d 181 (Iowa 1987). The peculiar facts in Bamhouse led us not to apply the rule in that case. We conclude that the absolute bar rule is presently the law…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beneficial Finance Co. of Black Hawk County v. ReedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Herman Ford-Mercury, Inc. v. BettsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
- Barnhouse v. Hawkeye State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. FarrarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Twin Bridges Truck City, Inc. v. HallingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re SCHWALBUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2006
- Stream v. GordySupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
- Foley v. Argosy Gaming Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Trustees of Iowa Laborers District Council Health & Welfare Trust v. Ankeny Community School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2014
- Metrobank, National Ass'n v. FosterDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.