Legal Opinion
In re the Marriage of Sugar
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 2, 2007No. 150324181; A131022PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Wife appeals from a judgment granting husband’s motion to terminate maintenance spousal support. We review de novo and affirm.
The parties’ marriage was dissolved in July 2004. Each party submitted a uniform support affidavit (USA). In her USA, wife represented to the court that she earned an hourly wage of $13.26, that she worked 40 hours per week, and that her gross monthly income was $1,785 — even though a person working 40 hours per week and four weeks each month at an hourly rate of $13.26 earns approximately $2,121 per month. Wife apparently deducted a mandatory PERS contribution in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- In re the Marriage of BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Caplener v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- In Re Marriage of WeberOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- In re the Marriage of TomosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cain Petroleum Inc. v. ZURICH AMERICAN INS., CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Mid-Valley Resources, Inc. v. Foxglove Properties, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Hallberg v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009