Legal Opinion

Wade v. Bartek

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1948No. 30397PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff in the amount of $1,148.74, plus one hundred dollars attorney’s fees, for services performed in digging a well.

The work was performed under an oral contract, the terms of which can best be set out by quoting the testimony of Mr. Wade. After explaining the preliminary negotiations, he testified:

“Q. What price did you quote? A. Fifty dollar set-up charge and Six Dollars a foot, and I also told him I couldn’t guarantee him water. I told him I would do good workmanship and we’d do the best we could to give him a well. . . . I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Donovan-Pattison Realty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Smith v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Armstrong v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Holland v. RhoadesOregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Griffin v. HartWashington Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Townsend v. Charles Schalkenbach Home for Boys, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. In Re Thompson v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Conradi v. ArnoldWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Michigan Millers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Wheeler v. RendslandWashington Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API