Legal Opinion

Reagh v. Dickey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1935No. 25517. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This is a suit for specific performance of a contract made under Rem. Rev. Stat., § 6894 [P. C. § 1440]. The action was brought by appellants as trustees under the will of Charles Sehalkenbach and as trustees of the estate of Minnie Wood Sehalken-bach, under and by virtue of a contract executed on June 23, 1926, by and between Charles Sehalkenbach and Minnie Wood Sehalkenbach, his wife. The defendants below, respondents here, are the executors of and beneficiaries under a will of Minnie Wood Sehalkenbach dated November 2, 1928. In the contract of June 23, 1926, there were mutual promises not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palmquist v. SagstadWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Parmeter v. BourneWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Alaska Banking & Safe Deposit Co. v. NoyesWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Krohn v. HirschWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Bloor v. BloorWashington Supreme Court · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cummings v. ShermanWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Norlin v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Income Investors, Inc. v. SheltonWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Columbia Lumber Co. v. BushWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. In Re Dunn's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API